The lawyer admitted that in principle
Although the scope of the AEPD's operations is unclear, providing this information would not violate ethical standards. Lawyers deal with very complex situations in their daily interactions with clients. Problems in many proceedings that are resolved in court can have important psychological consequences for those affected. If taken to extremes, the client may express certain feelings to the attorney that may lead the attorney to believe that his or her physical integrity may be in some kind of danger. Would communicating this to a third party who could help or assist the client constitute a violation of law or ethics?Recently, lawyer Ramón AlexandreIndia Car Owner Phone Number List had to inform a client who suffered from severe mental health problems that an appeal against a request to recognize a total and permanent disability had been dismissed."The client frankly thought this was terrible and mentioned in subsequent emails his emotional state, which included thoughts of madness and self-dissolution." At this point, the lawyer called the suicide hotline 024, urging him to report it to the emergency services fact. At the time, questions were asked to the extent to which information about a client's health status could be provided to emergency services through judicial proceedings in which the client was engaged. The Ethics Committee explained that the scope of professional confidentiality “seems illogical as it covers the expressed intentions (…) and therefore these intentions do not fall within the scope of withholding the information and do not affect their defence.” They recommend first contacting Talk to the client herself and then to those closest to her, such as her family. However, they admitted that "they have no answers when it comes to data protection".
https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/J-o-cAes6LGP4pUCoPz0aC9R4aDxgocDBE8sYSY-EwPjoxAfYuDtWQ1dHdz8mPYhUFBye3-YewLn9W0C1_dIqEZlebHyRJQxDD23xRhNguAnXng5vggEp648Mh2AWEnfHN_7Rf5mvDBFKX9hit0m0Bk
Article 6 of the General Data Protection Regulation provides that where personal data is lawfully processed, it is necessary for the vital interests of a natural person. However, this may be subject to interpretation. everything seemed clear: the right to life prevailed. But he added that there may have been an error in judgment and that the person's life was not in real danger.Salvat Seoane intends to implement a client suicide prevention program in cooperation with the Barcelona Bar Association. The Economist & Jurist asked Spain's Data Protection Authority what position it would take if a lawyer communicated and provided personal data of a client whom he considered to be at risk of suicide to emergency services. The agency responded, “We are unable to make preliminary rulings on cases that may be the subject of analysis if the agency receives claims related to the same facts.
Article 6 of the General Data Protection Regulation stipulates that processing personal data is justified if it's necessary for the vital interests of a natural person. However, the interpretation of this provision can be nuanced. While the primary concern is typically the preservation of life, there may be instances where the situation is less clear-cut. For instance, if it's determined that an individual's life is not immediately endangered, questions may arise regarding the validity of intervening.
Salvat Seoane is proposing to establish a client suicide prevention initiative in collaboration with the Barcelona Bar Association. In seeking clarity on the legal implications of a scenario where a lawyer shares personal data of a client deemed at risk of suicide with emergency services, The Economist & Jurist reached out to Spain's Data Protection Authority. The agency declined to offer a preemptive stance, stating its policy against making preliminary rulings on potential cases that could later come under its review due to related claims.
Страниц:
[1]