Seems prudent to clearly distinguish between

Sha704fikr

Treatment without falling into such a situation. The position of Western radicals will target privileged refugees. The arguments raised by the left against the provision of weapons fall into three main categories. The first seems to refer to concerns about confining the conflict to Ukraine. The left, as much as the right, fears inciting Russia to escalate the conflict which they implicitly acknowledge so that the West can legitimately sacrifice Ukraine to maintain peace in the civilized world. Despite numerous statements of support, the United States remains very cautious on this issue.

It reject concessions on the no-fly zone that Job Function Email List would involve Western coalition jets shooting down Russian planes, but it also includes the provision of fighter jets at the request of the Ukrainian government. In fact, it  direct participation of NATO countries in the war with Russia and the supply of defensive weapons to the Ukrainian army. Belarus has openly participated in the war in Ukraine by siding with the aggressors but this has not prompted the West to cross red lines. But we must also take into account the fact that anything Western does.




Preliminary warnings, even in the form of economic sanctions that Putin has characterized as a declaration of war, can be used as a pretext to expand the conflict if that is their intention. The second argument is against diplomatic rather than military solutions and against peaceful rhetoric rather than warlike rhetoric. They seem to have forgotten that the current negotiation process with the occupying forces depends to a large extent on power relations in the military sphere. On the other hand, the ignorance of the objectives surrounding Crimea and Donbas and the local population must be expressed.